Darlington / DNA Event / Severe Accident Study (Not)

Ontario Power Generation (OPG) is asking for a 13-year licence to refurbish (i.e., rebuild) the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station's 4 aging reactors. The Darlington licensing hearing is coming up the first week of November. Hearing details from the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) here.

Deadline for submissions = September 28th.

** More to come soon on why 13 year licence is a bad idea.

Learn more about this hearing & its implications for everyone in the GTA (Greater Toronto Area) at DNA's upcoming Sept. 17th event in Oshawa.

Thursday, Sept. 17th, 7 - 9 pm Room 106 Trent University's Oshawa Campus (55 Thornton Road South)

MAP

A panel of experts will discuss nuclear safety, emergency planning & environmental impacts to Lake Ontario in preparation for the November hearing on the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station refurbishment.

Expert Panel:

  • Mark Mattson, President, Lake Ontario Waterkeeper
  • Theresa McClenaghan, Executive Director & Counsel, Canadian Environmental Law Association (CELA)
  • Shawn-Patrick Stensil, Senior Nuclear Analyst, Greenpeace

DNA Sept. 17 event poster.

The Severe Accident Study (not)

You can read the Severe Accident Study. (if you want CNSC to mail you a hard copy, write to info@cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca & ask for one.)

My time is a bit limited at the moment, so for now I'll simply provide some key links you can use to find out more information about this "severe accident study" ... that is really not a severe accident study at all:

How Harper turned a nuclear watchdog into a lapdog

Darlington: It’s Not Worth the Risk

More Related Information:

Direction sign to Nukes
Direction sign to Nukes

<< these distances measured from downtown Toronto>>

Environment groups urge release of disaster scenarios report

** watch the 14-minute news conference here!

Environmental groups urge release of nuclear disaster scenarios report

The Canadian Press

Published Wednesday, August 19, 2015 10:29AM EDT

OTTAWA - Environmental groups are urging the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission to release a study on nuclear disaster scenarios that they say was suppressed.

The commission released a study last year looking at health and environmental consequences of accident scenarios, following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, but the groups say it wasn't released in full.

Greenpeace, the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility and other environmental organizations say emails obtained through access to information requests show management at the nuclear commission censored the original draft.

Related Stories

Canadian nuclear power plants completing upgrades prompted by Fukushima They say the original study analyzed the impacts of a Fukushima-scale accident at the Darlington nuclear plant, 70 kilometres east of Toronto, but that wasn't included in the version released to the public.

The groups cite an email from the director of the Darlington regulatory program division that says it would become a "focal point of any licence renewal" and would be used "malevolently" in a public hearing.

The nuclear commission is holding a hearing today in Ottawa on Ontario Power Generation's application to extend the operating life of four aging Darlington reactors and the environmental groups want the Fukushima-scale analysis released before public submissions are due next month.

 

News Release

Aug 19 2015

(Ottawa) ‐ Environment groups are asking the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) today to release a suppressed study detailing the weaknesses of offsite emergency response at the Darlington nuclear station in the event of a Fukushima‐scale accident.

“The CNSC has betrayed the public trust by concealing a study revealing risks to Toronto. The study should be released so these hazards can be addressed transparently and appropriate emergency plans put in place,” said Shawn‐Patrick Stensil, a senior energy analyst with Greenpeace.

The CNSC is holding a hearing today in Ottawa on Ontario Power Generation’s (OPG) application to extend the operating life of the four aging Darlington reactors 60 km east of downtown Toronto. The procedural request asks for the suppressed accident study to be released by next month so its findings can be used in public submissions to the second round of public hearings scheduled for November.

“Following the Fukushima disaster citizens asked the Commission to assess whether emergency response in the Toronto could cope with a major accident at Darlington. It is alarming the CNSC would withhold objective information on the public safety risks,” said Theresa McClenaghan, Executive Director of the Canadian Environmental Law Association (CELA).

In 2014, the CNSC did release an accident study and claimed it responded to public concern. But according to Access to Information, the public study is profoundly different from the original draft censored by CNSC management. The censored study analyzed the impacts of a Fukushima‐scale accident at Darlington, but when apprised of the results, senior management instructed staff to redraft the study to consider a much smaller accident.

“This is yet another example of how CNSC isn’t accountable to Canadians or objective on nuclear risks. It is past time for the next government to clean up the CNSC by insisting that they put the public interest above that of the nuclear industry,” said Dr. Gordon Edwards, president of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility (CCNR).

The groups that filed the request include CELA, CCNR, Durham Nuclear Awareness, Greenpeace, New Clear Free Solutions, Northwatch, Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) and Sierra Club Canada.

‐ 30 ‐

Information:

Mary Ambrose, Communications Officer, Greenpeace, 416‐930‐9055 Dr. Gordon Edwards, President, CCNR, 514‐839‐7214 Theresa McClenaghan, Executive Director, CELA, 416‐662‐8341 (cell) Shawn‐Patrick Stensil, Senior Energy Analyst, Greenpeace, 416 884 7053 [Eng/Fr]

 

Related Blog Posts